As long as I was on my way to hell---I might as well enjoy the journey.-Edward Cullen thinking of Bella in Midnight Sun

Archive for the ‘Religion’

Tarot Reading10.28.08

That was the very first time that my half-cooked brain had successfully convinced the skeptic side of me to try tarot reading. I’m talking about last Saturday when I met this group of individuals who are into paranormal stuffs. These people are into things that interest me a lot. Matters and non-matters beyond normal has intrigued me ever since, and it’s really great to meet humans with the same line of interest.

To be honest, that was the very first time I heard of the word “Wiccan”. I checked it out online and found out that this word refers to people who practice herbal healing and benign witchcraft. We all know witchcraft for sure. From all those witches we saw in movies and comic strips(and those stories my great father told me about our witch neighbor). They always belong to the dark side, and if you think of a witch, the common image that would float on your bloody head is definitely of that of a wrinkled old woman, with a long pointed nose, a very long and gray hair, wearing a black robe, black hat and a broomstick and with those menacing blood-red eyes that would surely scare the shit out of you.

Well, the above graphical description is definitely too good for cinematic purposes. Wiccan is a sort of religion as what one told me when I asked her about it. It’s a way of life and it’s more on getting intimate with nature. Others are into feng shui, palm reading, astrology, sorcery, shamanism, ghost hunting, and a lot more paranormal stuffs that are not familiar to me. Madam Dulce, a professor from UP-Tacloban was also with us. She’s a self-confessed witch and she said that her being a witch is hereditary. Her confession made me really curious about her.

Anyways, I tried tarot reading, and the very first tarot reader that I approached really hit it straight. All his readings are very true, but my ever skeptic head doesn’t want to let it go that easy. If all his readings are true then that must be credited to the fact that I try to relate his readings to things that are currently happening in my life. Or maybe, the cards are really saying the truth. But, I guess it really doesn’t matter which is which.

And then, I tried another reading. The results of this one disappointment me a lot. The reading is based on my self-thought questions that are answerable with a yes or no. Of all three questions that I made two had answers of NO and the other one was MAYBE. I felt a little depressed. Maybe is definitely a No. I really don’t understand myself why the reading results affected me so much. I guess I was too consumed with my emotional dilemma that time that I forgot that I should not take the readings seriously.

Tarot Reading

Tarot Reading

with Madam Dulce

with Madam Dulce

Discussion

Discussion

Click here for more photos.  Photo Credit: CPS

Share This Post

Posted in Paranormal, People, Religionwith No Comments →

Have you questioned Christ’s morality?03.28.07

I posted this topic in my forum, at istorya, and at friendster. And so far there’s only one mortal who replied and it’s from istorya…here is the topic…

Check this one…this is a statement
by Bertrand Russell from his book “Why
I am Not a Christian”…

“Then you come to moral questions.
There is one very serious defect to my
mind in Christ’s moral character, and
that is that He believed in hell. I do
not myself feel that any person that
is really profoundly humane can
believe in everlasting punishment.
Christ certainly as depicted in the
Gospels did believe in everlasting
punishment, and one does find
repeatedly a vindictive fury against
those people who would not listen to
His preaching — an attitude which is
not uncommon with preachers, but which
does somewhat detract from superlative
excellence.”

and here’s a reply from one istoryan:

Diem: It’s all a matter of interpretation and one must consider all things. As Bertrand Russell based his statement on events according to the Gospels of the New Testament, so I shall use the same as basis for my statement .

I am not truly disagreeing with Bertrand Russell’s statement but let us consider all the angles.

One has to remember that Jesus was raised as a Jew, and Jews have a severe crime-punishment system going back from the time of Moses.(An eye for an eye)

Jesus was just using an effective way of reaching to the people of His Time. Through his sermons and parables, He presented himself as a recognizable strong authority figure by using language, notions, images and beliefs that the common people could remember and relate to.

The Jews then were a hard people living during hard and turbulent times. They have had a violent history, and even until now suffer a violent present in Israel. You’d think that Jesus would be effective as a Prophet if he presented himself as a softie constantly promoting pacifism and love? Preaching that way to Jews will be like preaching to a stone wall, casting pearls before swine! And amidst the crowds that gather around Jesus were the arrogant, ultraconservative Pharisees and Sadducees, the toughest of the lot to break!

One has to be as hard as rock and as just as resolute, in order to break these people down then build them up! That was Jesus did. Jesus preached about eternal punishment because it was something his audience, his people believed in.He spoke in a way to make sure people would listen and not only just listen, but take to heart His words.

That’s my humble opinion of it. And I would like to humbly suggest something too.

If we are to ‘judge’ a person (be the Person a Godhead or a Human-prophet), let us remember to not judge him/her merely by just the words s/he spoke but also take in account his/her actions.

According to the Gospels and aside from the miracles, please remember that–

1) Jesus stopped a mob from stoning a woman accused of adultery, and the mob was just doing an obligation according to the Law of Moses (Leviticus);

2) He spent time talking, teaching with the pariahs of Jewish society(like the tax collectors for the Roman Legions who were considered as bad as traitors and thieves);

3) He even allowed his own freedom to be traded with that of the murderer Barnabas;

4) Without any resistance or attempts to defend himself, Jesus was beaten and scoured;

5) And even near the painful moment of his slow Death on the Cross, Jesus comforted a criminal.

As Bertrand Russell did note: Jesus had a “vindictive fury” when he spoke of hell but as one can see, his actions are “profoundly humane”. That for me, tells a lot about true intentions.

Jesus is a complex character; and a lot of people often misunderstood him even until now. That is why we must consider all things. Carefully.

I’d like to believe that Bertrand Russell wanted us to consider Christ’s morality only to ignite our own personal questions of our own morality.

For everyone’s kind consideration.

_________________________________

and here’s my reply:

EOD: hmmmn…nice explaination but you really don’t have to explain. lol…i was just quite intrigue with Bertrand’s views and wanted to see what’re the other mortals reactions…

Bertrand is actually a pacifist who doesn’t believe that the real reason that people accept religion has anything to do with argumentation…it’s because it’s useless to argue when that person’s predicament is soleby based on his faith.

but then as you said we should not judge people by what they say instead judge them by their deeds. but as I look closely at your statement
you tend to say that Christ uses HELL as a sort of a threat…so that those mortals in those times would listen and obey him. So, do you suggest that Christ is LYING? and for all this time what the church has thought us about HELL is only a LIE? They’re telling us of eternal damnation just to scare us?


to be continued…or check this link

~eod~

Share This Post

Posted in Favorite Issues, Religionwith No Comments →

What can you say about this article?12.18.05


Religion: The Scourged of Society

I loathe religion. I loathe it with a passion. Since its conception, it has inspired
foolishness, destruction, and needless death. The bible, Talmud, and Koran all speak of great battles. Many of these battles were fought by people disagreeing over the existence of God. Or their God. The Greek and Roman civilizations destroyed native cultures by the handful to assert their culture and religion over the natives. The Romans slaughtered Jews and Christians. The Crusades were all fought to claim a ‘holy land’ which killed 500,000 people. In a population
of just a few hundred million, that’s a huge amount. The inquisitions held in Western Europe decimated anyone who wasn’t a Christian. The Holocaust was genocide of a religious group. Ireland, Israel, the entire Middle East… all up in arms over whose God is better. And how many cultures are still hurting from the influence of religion? How many countries in Africa fighting after western missionaries set up societies for the native cultures and fled? The Sudan, Rwanda… just a few still embroiled in conflict. Religion is the cause of death in every part of the world.

But that’s not enough. Religious fanatics want to ensure the future is full of needless death too. Stem cell research is a non-issue. Why is it an issue!? There is a decision to be made. Either stem cells are destroyed in the hopes of finding cures for serious diseases. Or just destroyed. It angers me how useless this issue is. What would Jesus do? Kill babies to save people or just kill babies?! Neither choices are nice ones, but a choice has to be made. And for religious fanatics to wave off a chance for a cure for potentially millions of people’s pain and suffering. We all know the story of Galileo, no? How he ventured a scientific theory that later proved to be true, but disagreed with the church? Where would we be if Galileo never spoke? If he was like the rest of the sheep,happy to be told how things were without second guessing? The church apologized for that incident 300 years later! 300 years?! That’s how long it took for the church to accept that the universe wasn’t geocentric? This is the same church that told people not to bathe for several hundred years. That smell? That’s the
smell of benevolence.

What religion accepts as fact is relative to the times. Before man achieved sustained flight, we thought heaven was in the skies and the angels sat on clouds. We couldn’t dig too far into the ground, so of course hell was underground. Now? No, no no. Heaven and Hell are places that don’t exist on the physical plane, they’re another place entirely.

Granted,religion has provided a basis for society as we know it today. In the time when people were few and far from each other, it drew them together and formed communities. Religion has motivated people to help each other, provide homes and medicine, time and money for each other. And for a pre-modern society, that is a great asset. But hasn’t religion served its cause? Hasn’t religion outworn its welcome? There are homeless outreach programs, drug rehab programs, organizations that provide rovisions for starving people in Africa. But do we need a book to tell us that we should be nice? Sure, these are great things these people are doing, but why do it in the name of some higher power when we can claim it for the sake of humanity? “Humans can be infinitely kind”, the message should be, not “humans can be infinitely kind when receiving God’s love.” It’s about motivation. And there are much better motivators than religion when religion has a track record like that.

Again, war is so destructive. Not only does it cripple countries involved, it can drive civilization backwards. Lives are lost, schools destroyed, disease runs rampant. Why do we need more reasons for this? Karl Marx once said that religion and poverty go hand in hand. Another of his theories suggested that all wars have roots in class struggle. In societies with poverty, there is sure to be class struggle. Therefore, religion and war go hand in hand. We should be working for a better tomorrow, not a war-filled tomorrow.

Anyway, who needs religion when we have modern science to explain and prove its explanations for life? The scientific method allows for theories to be changed and added on to. The bible is infallible. It can’t be contested. Why? It doesn’t prove itself except to those who believe. Only the faithful believe. And that’s the thing about faith. It’s not proof. It is what it is. If one believes in something, it means that they aren’t completely sure. It’s not knowledge, it’s faith. These ancient texts, without aid from any sort of science, were created by the few people of the time who knew how to read and write. Literacy was a rare treasure 2000 years ago. Only the highest members of society had access to books and scrolls. Only a very, very lucky few knew how to write. Just a thought here, but if one has an advantage, will they exploit it? Could they write texts and tell stories to simple farmers and herders about a great benevolent creator who saves people? And threaten everlasting pain and anguish to those who disagree?

On that subject, picture this scenario: You are a farmer at the dawn of civilization. You don’t know much about anything besides what you do. There are no telescopes,microscopes, medicine. You pick up a rock, and place it somewhere else. What goes through your mind? Perhaps “I put this rock here. If I didn’t, it wouldn’t be there. Where did I come from? Obviously, from this example, something must have put me here.” Through that rationale, pre-modern man may have come to the conclusion that they must have been created through the works of a greater being.

Either way,God is as great and kind as many would esteem him, why is he allowing all that goes on to go on? Why would I have cause to write this? Why are there millions of starving, sick, dying, unhappy, disadvantaged, disenfranchised, abused, neglected children? Why? Settle for it this way. Either God is a cruel, evil creator, or doesn’t exist. And if he’s a cruel evil sort of creator, I wouldn’t worship him either.

In conclusion, whether or not there is a God in the end, life is what you make of it. No book needs to tell us how to be a decent human being. We don’t need a higher power to direct us into being good people. To resign ourselves to living our lives being kind so we can go into heaven is selfish and wasteful. Live a good life for the sake of living a good life. Be kind for the sake of having kindness returned. Don’t believe everything that it is you heard, no matter how
many times it is told. Always have proof. Worship yourself, treat yourself with ultimate respect. Be your own God.

Share This Post

Posted in Religionwith No Comments →

  • You Avatar
  • Custom Search
    No one can take from us the joy of the first becoming aware of something, the so-called discovery. But if we also demand the honor, it can be utterly spoiled for us, for we are usually not the first. What does discovery mean, and who can say that he has discovered this or that? After all it's pure idiocy to brag about priority; for it's simply unconscious conceit, not to admit frankly that one is a plagiarist. -Goethe
  • Profile: I’m a pragmatist, an optimist, and a gothic fanatic. I love Rajneesh Osho’s Philosophy, admire Jean Paul Sarte’s and annoyed by Kierkegaard’s. I believe that Cognitive learning is the most effective way to gain knowledge. I’m straightforward, and love to mingle with any kinds of human beings. In the future, I wanted to travel the whole world and share my experiences to my future grand daughters or grand sons. But, if I’ll become a spinster I will spend the rest of my life enjoying the sense of being alone, but not lonely.Read More (Photo Credit: Scar)
  •    Banner
    Budget Wedding Photography

  • Meta

  • Favorite Posts

  • REVIEWS

    Silk
    Movie: SILK
    The story yielded a climax of guilt-provoking scenes yet it’s not actually what it seems. The tip of the climax sends a message to everyone about the congruency of true love and unconditional love. read more...

    Hannibal
    Movie: Hannibal
    But then, of all fictional villains Dr. Hannibal Lecter’s character impressed me a lot. Well, not his prowess in murders and cannibalism…but the patina of his thinking. He’s very clever and he is very sharp and very talented, very shrewd yet very cunning and very dangerous. read more...

    Mein Teil by Rammstein
    Music Video: Rammstein's Mein teil
    If you’re a first timer and a moralist you will be appalled of how the video brutally illustrated the Fellatio(oral stimulation of the penis or in short the blowjob). Some said that Mein teil also means My Penis in the German sense. read more...

    TOP POSTS

    Crazy Day and Oblation Run
    The hordes of dusty foot creatures patiently awaited the most anticipated “camel” show event which is of course the oblation run (running naked with black masks on their bloody faces) by the newly recruit APO members (who are mostly from other schools). When obli’s statue was blindfolded with black cloth everyone knew that it’s the bloody signal that “camels” will be running around the campus soon. read more...

    Oblation Run in the Campus…
    And everybody’s giggling and murmuring something to each others ears with malicious looks shamelessly plastered on their friggin’ faces. Hahahahaha! I couldn’t help but laugh, and at the back of my mind anticipate how would it like to see naked frat men running around the campus exposing their tools. read more...

    I miss Philo...
    The common ground of these two fellows is they see to it that every person would feel special every time they’re around. These kind of people are so rare to find and so precious to lose. Anyways, here are photos of my philo class last semester… read more...

  • HOT TOPICS


    FOOD TRIP: 10 DOVE STREET by Blink
    their set consists of soup-salad-sandwich-cake for only P160 for the whole deal..they have lots of soups-salads-sandwiches to choose from but u might wanna try the ones i've tasted... 3-4 coices of cakes..(no cakes on the counter yet since we went there very early before 11a so they were jst setting up, they do open at 11a) read more...

    ORGY IN CEBU by Macabees666
    People here, have you heard about this? I heard about some students from this particular school doing this kind of sexual activity. Have you heard about it? read more...

    PENIS ENVY by Indie Chinkie
    girls, nakaexperience ba mo ug penis envy katong bata pa mo? meaning nagwonder mo nganong naay penis inyong mga amahan and kamo wala...and that leads you to question yourself why wala kay penis? And then it causes you to love your father more than your mother...and you actually get jealous everytime the two of them get intimate with each other? read more...

    TOO MUCH SEX CAN KILL YOU by Blueberry
    If only the male organ can really talk, based on medical science and Oriental books on sex like the Kama Sutra from India, Tao of Sex from China, Pillow Book from Japan, and the Perfumed Garden from the Arabs, it would beg every man - the unfaithful married husband and the promiscuous unmarried man - to be more careful about sex, otherwise it can really derange his mind or shorten his lifespan. read more...

    SLEEP PARALYSIS by Indie Chinkie
    while natulog mo kay nakasense mo nga naay other presence with you in the room and then suddenly someone choke you...push you down and then dili nimo malihok imo lawas...dili sad ka kasiyagit...and aware ka nga mata naka pero dili nimo mabuka imong mata? read more...

    MORBID OBESITY by Indie Chinkie
    The doctors stated that morbid obesity is a disease. It can be caused by a traumatic experience. A guy on the show stated he was backing a fire truck into a spot at the firehouse where he worked. His best friend decided that he was going to jump onto the side of the truck while it was moving. He lost his footing, slid under the truck and was run over. read more...

    BLIND ITEM by Indie Chinkie
    Ehmmnn...Naay guy nga member rapud diri sa forum nga nag-ask nako something about the two girls rapud diri sa forum...hekhekhek... read more...
  • Add to Technorati Favorites

wp